Employing "foreigners"
Many Asians cannot be more familiar with the following situation: they are well or over qualified for a job, but were still turned down by employers because they either lack local experience or their qualification was attained from a university in their country of origin.
This has happened to generations of immigrants, even if they are already a proud NZ citizen - this is one of the things that makes you feel not that proud of your choice.
I don't really want to label it racism, but look at what happens when the tide is turned: The new "Kiwi first" employment policy means a Japanese restaurant owner cannot recruit chefs from Japan because there already are people with "appropriate" skills available in NZ. According to the report, people with "appropriate skills" meaning they need to learn the difference between sushi and sashimi on job.
And yet many "Kiwis" are moaning in the discussion forum, saying people deserve a chance to learn, asking why don't they train kiwis on job?
The rumours that Asian people only employ Asian employees are totally untrue, at least in the Chinese community I know of. There is golden rule for any Chinese entrepreneur who wants to start a business here - a Kiwi receptionist is a must. This is not because Chinese entrepreneurs cannot pass NCEA leavel 1 English, but people out there just don't want to deal with businesses that are not owned by "one of them".
Any employer would prefer people with local experience and knowledge while having suitable skills, however, if they cannot find any here, they ought to be allowed to employ from oversea. If my memory serves me right, it was this government which wants NZ to increase its productivity and become a global economy - not.
I don't agree that the idea of "Asian people only employing other Asians" is totally untrue. I'd say a quick look around would show that it pretty obviously stands up as a generalization. Of course, like all generalizations it has shaky foundations. Many Asians do employ non-Asians. The larger the business, the more likely there will be non-Asian employees. Also, Asians largely employing other Asians is not necessarily bad, or unnatural, or something that needs to be changed.
I think your article sets up a false distinction between 'Kiwi' and 'Asian'. The 'kiwi-first' employment policy is about protecting jobs for New Zealand citizens, many of whom are both 'Asian' and 'Kiwi'. The policy may be poorly thought out and fundamentally stupid, but its goals are laudable enough. There are ridiculous numbers of people on benefits in NZ - perhaps they are never going to be trained to become sushi chefs, but somebody needs to do something to try and get more of these people in jobs.